The following article will cover:
Proactive training is essential to guard against workplace discrimination and harassment allegations. This training (especially when focused on anti-harassment and anti-discrimination) often reveals ongoing issues, enabling employers to intervene before matters escalate.
Establishing an employment policy handbook is also of paramount importance. Every employee should be required to read this handbook and their acknowledgment of its content should be documented and stored.
Moreover, management plays a crucial role in ensuring that these policies are adhered to, especially during employee reviews, merit increases, and exit interviews. It's in these interactions that employers can gather invaluable insights into the practical implementation of these policies.
Finally, when claims are brought forward, they must be thoroughly investigated to determine their validity. Keeping records of this investigation and any actions taken as a direct result can help to protect employers and their businesses should the matter escalate later down the road.
Handling employee grievances demands a structured approach. The best way to tackle these issues is to incorporate mediation and arbitration clauses in both employment handbooks and onboarding documents.
Mediation involves hiring an unbiased professional who works with both parties to reach a resolution outside of the courtroom. If this proves unsuccessful, the matter then proceeds to arbitration, a formalized, private litigation process outside the traditional court system where decisions have legal enforceability. Because arbitration is private, faster, and usually more cost-effective than traditional litigation, it is highly favorable for almost everyone involved.
Additionally, the role of the HR department in this framework cannot be underestimated. They are the first line of defense when a grievance is raised, provided they're equipped with the right set of questions to discern the nature of the situation. If preliminary interventions don't resolve the matter, mediation is typically the next best step.
Non-compete agreements are designed to protect an employer's legitimate business interests, which may include confidential information, proprietary sales strategies, unique operational methods, or non-public client lists. However, the enforceability of these agreements often depends on their scope and reasonableness.
In a bustling environment like New York, overly restrictive geographical limits, such as prohibiting employment in competing businesses within five miles, might be considered excessive. For instance, barring a low-level employee with access to confidential information from working within this radius could effectively exclude them from their industry in the entire city – and even neighboring regions, like New Jersey or Long Island.
The duration of the restriction is another significant consideration. A five-year restriction could be viewed as overly burdensome since it is a considerable period of time in the employment context, potentially constituting a significant portion of an individual's career. As a result, a shorter time frame, such as six months or a year, is generally more enforceable in the legal context.
In any case, it's essential to be precise about the information or processes you want to protect. If an employer is only focused on preventing the misuse of confidential data, restrictions in a non-compete agreement are more likely to be enforced. However, broadly preventing an employee from working in a competing industry in any capacity might be deemed too restrictive.
Courts tend to prioritize ensuring that employees remain employable in their chosen profession. Overly restrictive non-compete agreements, which render employees unemployable in their field, are usually not viewed favorably by the judiciary.
The hospitality sector's benefits landscape diverges based on union affiliation:
In Unionized Settings:
In Non-Unionized Settings:
Call Now To Schedule A Consultation
And Protect Your Business!